3 Signs Your Characters Are Victims

The first part of this is going to be a short explanation of the title. What I mean by victim, as referring to one—or several—characters, is a person or people who do not make choices. They don’t act, but are acted upon. There are several successful novels where this is the case (Anna Karenina), but contemporary wisdom dictates that at least one character ought to have an impact on the story (this is known as a character-driven novel).

So, how can you tell whether your characters are victims? Here, have a list:

  1. Your novel is about the inevitability of a certain fate. Even though your characters struggle against the norm, by the end of the story they are forced to acquiesce to it. Think Romeo and Juliet, before the final scene. With the final scene, Shakespeare’s tale is one of the power of young love; without it, the classic love story is a warning to any would-be barrier-crossers. Don’t disobey your parents, or you’ll wind up dead, and the world will forget you. But Shakespeare’s clever, so he gives us that final scene.
  2. Your characters keep wondering why this is happening to them. They’re just an average, everyday nobody who lands in some horrible situation, with no way to get out. Note: if the main point of your novel is that everyday people can be extraordinary, disregard this. But if the inverse is true, you have a passive character on your hands.
  3. Your characters are static. I could write a whole post on static vs. dynamic characters (and I might, at some point), but the simple explanation is this: dynamic characters change, in response to events of the novel. This mainly pertains to the main character, as not everyone will be impacted by whatever happens. Your main character, however—and possibly a few minor characters—should change. Not just physically; in fact, for the purposes of determining static or dynamic, you should discount physical changes.

Ayn Rand referred to novels with actors as romantic novels, and victim-filled novels as trash—no, just kidding. She called them Naturalist works, under the assertion that any story taking the power away from characters inevitably gives it to nature. Think of the balance of power as a spectrum: on the left, nature is the sole force in the world, on the right it’s people. A good novel ought to lean more toward the characters having power, because the readers will be other people. You could write a story in which the finale concludes with a villain being struck by lightning, which arguably happens in real life, but it wouldn’t satisfy.

 

This is a short list. Can you think of anything to add? Would you like to see a Naturalist resurgence? I’d love to hear from you; leave a comment below, and I’ll do my best to respond.

9 thoughts on “3 Signs Your Characters Are Victims

  1. My favorite novels mostly start with a character getting dragged kicking and screaming to do something. What can I say, I’m a Hobbit at heart to. Lots of us have no control over if something happens to us, it’s what we do after that that matters most. I’d rather read about a character that worries if their going to get through something than a butt kicking super character any day. It’s why a love Spiderman but Superman was always boring for me no matter how many flaws they gave him. There just wasn’t the same human side to him.

    1. Hmm, the Hobbit is an interesting example. Spiderman as well. I quite agree that Superman is rather boring (there’s almost no conflict for someone with unlimited power), but I might also point out that Bilbo is very much a dynamic character, as well as Peter Parker.

      That being said, the MC or viewpoint character getting dragged into an adventure is the premise for several great novels. Part of the hero’s journey (the Calling), and I agree that I love when it happens, because that tends to kickstart the action. I think it’s Orson Scott Card who says that the rule of thumb is that misfortune can bring a character into trouble, but using good fortune to carry them out of it is cheating.

      1. The drive of both characters is to get back to living a normal peaceful life at heart though, not to get glory or be great. They become great inspite of their core temperaments (well the Hobbit does at least) rather than because of them. I think that’s another reason why I love them. Characters that value peace or their families or glory just speak to me.

      2. Haha don’t worry about it. Yeah, I think characters whose motivations aren’t world-shifting tend to be more relatable, and even wars to maintain or regain the status quo can yield some very strong characters. The Hobbit and Lord of the Rings are probably two of the best examples.

      1. Ugh. It went up. 162.4K. And because it’s now relevant since writing the sequel, I’m thinking about putting a section that I removed back in that’s about another 8K words. There’s no way I’m going to get it traditionally published at this rate unless the self-pub copy sells by the hundreds of thousands.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s